Tuesday, December 9, 2014

Obesity commentary


After posting on obesity and some of its consequences, I’ve received mixed responses (on and offline) with feedback like... “informative and interesting” implying, politely, that they read the piece but were not moved to further comment. What I was hoping for is commentary from persons that have a vested interest in the topic, skin in the game if you will, to give their opinion or tell their story on some aspects of the points raised.  Although there is not a lot of glamor in the topic (obesity and its consequences) it is a public health concern. But equally important is the fact (as made in one of the post) that there are many solicitations out there that try to market weight loss to improve body image and improve social life in a quick - painless – way without the discipline needed for true sustained weight loss and a healthier lifestyle. These methods often do not have the science to back them and are often misleading. The next post will be on the metabolic syndrome.  This is a constellation of conditions including obesity, hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes, and derangements of cholesterol (good and bad). These conditions when present together form the perfect storm for the development of heart disease, kidney disease and stroke.

Friday, December 5, 2014

On treating obesity and diabetes with herbal preparations

I am often surprised when I receive advertisements – online - clearly targeting the obese population that offer to reduce weight over a short period of time and without significant diet or exercise. The ads describe some fat altering diet supplement that can be purchased, and there is some urgency to purchase, as the offer is usually time limited. And accompanying the ad there is often a before and after photo over a very short period (weeks) demonstrating a dramatic change in body image. I often wonder who would have such expectation of – weight loss and improvement in body image over such a short period? And what of the complications of obesity that are not obvious in the body image photos? In these ads there is little or no mention of any of the complications associated with obesity such as diabetes rather just the focus on the before and after image.  Should health consequences of being overweight or obese be mentioned in weight loss ads?

Obesity is linked to type II diabetes mellitus (DM).  Data obtained form the NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) collected over a five-year period studied a large population (over twenty-one thousand) with diabetes. Over 80% of patients with DM had a BMI (body mass index – a measure of body fat using height and weight) over 25% placing them in the overweight category, and 50% had BMI of over 30% placing them in the obese category1.  In obese individuals the body’s production and sensitivity to insulin (the hormone secreted by the pancreas that regulates blood sugar levels – glucose) can be altered and either you don’t produce enough or there may be resistance to insulin.  Even if you take insulin (exogenous) obesity can alter the way the body reacts to it, and if there is resistance to insulin higher levels may be needed to keep the blood glucose level under control. DM related complications are quite serious. They affect every organ in the body. The most well known complications are kidney disease – leading to dialysis, cardiovascular disease – leading to heart attacks and strokes, and the effects on the circulatory system leading to limb loss; these are a few of the most serious complications. Knowing the significance of DM’s consequences it is hard to believe that obesity, which is linked to DM, is not taken as seriously as it should be by those individuals who are obese and at risk for DM?  Lifestyle modification (the foundation of the treatment of obesity) includes diet, and exercise.  And healthcare providers should repeatedly reinforce this to their patients. Lifestyle modifications alone have been documented to significantly reduce weight and reduce the risk of developing diabetes, and if medications are ultimately needed for treatment of DM they should be administered by a knowledgeable healthcare professional in addition to the lifestyle modifications.

Would you attempt to treat DM yourself with herbal medications without the guidance of a healthcare professional? Lately I have been paying attention to online ads that promote the treatment of DM using herbal preparations. I am not sure where the science is that documents the efficacy and safety of these products - I have not found it in peer review journals. But a disease such as DM should be monitored under the supervision of a healthcare professional, and not self treated with online mail order preparations that have not been properly been evaluated by regulatory agencies. At very least these preparations will probably not provide the desired effect and at worst they may even do harm. So please, consult your healthcare professional about these and other alternative medications. If one were to attempt to use a supplement for DM and glucose control (and I am not advocating this) how would you monitor the efficacy of the preparation? This leads into a discussion about monitoring blood glucose levels, and the over all periodic evaluation required when dealing with DM or any other chronic disease.

1- JAMA 2006 April 5, 295 (13) 1549.


Wednesday, December 3, 2014

The obesity crisis

Obesity is a growing public health concern. Multiple studies have evaluated not only adverse health effects caused by obesity but also direct and indirect medical cost associated with it. In a ten-year period (1999-2010) one in three Americans were categorized as obese.  The classification used to define (and grade) obesity may vary between experts. The WHO (World Health Organization) uses a 1-3 grading system based on BMI (body mas index) whereas some experts define obesity based on the percentage of body fat generally (greater than 25%). However it is defined it is a health risk that is associated with - and can lead to - other medical conditions form asthma to varicose veins, but is of particular importance when the heart, brain or endocrine/metabolic systems are involved - more on this later. Lifestyle modification is the first course of action and the foundation of the treatment of obesity. The major components of the modification (diet, exercise, and behavior therapy) have been documented to significantly reduce weight and reduce the risk of developing diabetes (a major complication linked to obesity). In one study the effects of weight loss and the attendant glucose control lowered cardiovascular (heart) risk following the modification and the benefits were still evident four years later 1.  It is little wonder that public health experts spend so much effort trying to create public policy – requiring disclosure of calorie counts in foods, and size limits of sugar containing drinks - that will stem the tide of obesity. But should food and drink consumption be dictated by healthcare policy decisions? This is a matter of public debate for policy and public health experts, but in my opinion prudent restraints limiting excessive consumption can’t hurt. After all you can be refused alcohol if you are visibly intoxicated.

Practically speaking life style modification is much easier to advocate that to actually accomplish. Factors including poverty, education, and socioeconomic status have been linked to obesity. Although the research is not conclusive in this area, there is a relationship between family income, food insecurity and obesity. And in certain populations there is a direct link between poverty and obesity in children and adolescents2. Is there really a link between poverty, food insecurity and obesity? Food security is the availability of safe, consumable, and sufficient food. Food insecurity is the opposite where the possibility of hunger and even starvation may exist. The recent financial crisis of 2008 resulted in a rise in food insecurity in the U.S. One report sites up to 14.5% of households as food insecure in 2012 (four years after the crisis) with households of single parents, and Black and Hispanic households being higher than the general population 3. In poorer neighborhoods it is easier to satisfy a calorie requirement with readily available fast food that are cheap and maybe available 24/7 than higher nutritional foods such as fruits, vegetables, and high value proteins, which may be in short supply, and at a premium. Persons that derive their calories form high calorie low nutritional value meals not only suffer the effects of the poor nutrition but are also at risk for obesity. And the wonderful produce that comes to the local farmers market once or twice a week is often not found in inner city and if it is the cost of those foods may be prohibitive to poorer populations. So the high calorie fast food though satisfying and relative inexpensive is more the food of necessity and less of choice. These are sociopolitical issues that go far beyond the scope of this post. These and other questions both social scientist and medical scientist will have to work through. For now public healthcare advocates will continue to advise on prudent management of the modifiable risk (calorie consumption and exercise). We must watch what we eat (within financial means) and we must also promote exercise and healthy activities i.e. Get Active work out, popularized by the First Lady and the NFL Play 60 that will help burn the calories. Hopefully the socioeconomic issues will be addresses by our lawmakers in a judicious and equitable manner.

1- Circulation. 2012 March 6; 125(9): 1157–1170

2- JAMA.  2012; 307(5):491-7 (ISSN: 1538-3598).org